What
is the role of technology in resource and agency coordination?
Technology
is essentially the creation of tools. Tools are used to make a task
more efficient. At the simplest level, you use a hammer to
concentrate force on a single spot, or a lever to add force while
moving an object. Tools need to be used correctly to be efficient;
try pulling out a nail with the striking side of a claw hammer, for
example. In terms of resource and agency coordination, technology
provides tools to make the tasks of coordination more efficient.
Cell phones and satellite radios make mobile communications possible,
a thumb drive full of contact numbers and procedural documentation
beats the heck out of lugging around a briefcase. Take the case of
the FDNY command center during the WTC
bombing:
“Chief
officers at the World Trade Center scene kept track of the location
and assignment of units, but they had no way of backing-up their
records. For example, the FDNY Field Communications Unit was
responsible for tracking the assignment of Fire units to different
alarms, towers, and staging areas. This unit worked next to the
Incident Command Post and kept records on a magnetic command board,
using small magnets placed on a diagram to indicate unit locations.
Chief officers at the Operations Posts in the two towers also used
magnetic command boards to track the units assigned to their
buildings. These boards and the records they kept were destroyed when
the towers collapsed” (McKinsey & Company, n.d, p. 11). A
tablet with a custom app could have managed that data, and have been
backed up automatically through wireless connection. Data collected
in the wake of incidents can be analyzed through statistical
software to provide better planning for the next such incident. In
every component of effective coordination, from communications to
data management to interoperability, advances in technology makes
these tasks more efficient. “Information technologies and crisis
informatics may vastly increase response efficiency
by aiding in the communication and interoperability of responding
organisations and the communities impacted” (Bevc, Barlau, &
Passanante, 2009, p.19)
Why
is the strategic planning process a dynamic endeavor necessitating
complete evaluation to sustain an agency’s efficiency?
Every
step of implemented change has an effect on the process. In
addition, unplanned changes to the environment that the implemented
change is taking place in can have an effect on the planning
process. The strategic management and planning process
is a cycle in which each stage of planning and change may require
additional analysis, planning, and correction. “Assessing the
current position requires measurement, monitoring and evaluation of
outputs and outcomes from the previous planning cycle to determine
whether policy objectives are being achieved” (“Leadership,
strategic thinking and planning drive good government, JAKARTA POST,”
2004, para. 11).
Bevc,
C., Barlau, A., & Passanante, N. (2009). Mapping convergence
points in the initial emergency response to 9/11. Disasters,
33(4), 786–808.
Leadership,
strategic thinking and planning drive good government, JAKARTA POST.
(2004, October 12). WorldSources
Online. Retrieved February 19, 2015 from
http://search.proquest.com.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/docview/340564046?pq-origsite=summon
McKinsey
& Company. (n.d.). FDNY
McKinsey report - Increasing the FDNY’s preparedness.
Fire Department of New York. Retrieved February 28, 2015 from
http://www.nyc.gov/html/fdny/html/mck_report/toc.shtml
No comments:
Post a Comment