Organizational
Recommendations to Spur Recruitment: Mitigating Officer Shortage at
Centerville Police Department
Steve
Durchin
Recruitment
Officer
Office
of the Chief
Centerville
Police Department
Report
Submitted August 24, 2014
Abstract
Due
to organizational changes made at Centerville PD and the effects
these changes have had on staffing and morale, we have found that
potential officers do not want to be employed at the department.
This report discusses possible changes to our organization that will
make recruitment here more attractive to potential officers. These
changes involve plans for police socialization, power implementation,
and efforts to reduce organizational conflict at the
interorganizational and intraorganizational
levels.
Table of
Contents
- Introduction. 3
- Police Socialization 4
- Police Culture Background 4
- Strategies to Aid Recruitment 5
- Anticipated Issues 5
- Distribution of Power 6
- Types of Power Arrangements 6
- Officer Concerns 7
- Implementation Strategy 7
- Reduction of Organizational Conflict 7
- Current Issues 7
- Mitigation Strategies 9
- Conclusions 9
- Recommendations 10
- References 11
Introduction
Due to recent
difficulty Centerville Police Department has had in recruiting new
officers, the Department authorized a study to analyze reasons for
this difficulty. The researchers found that recent organizational
change at the Department is partly to blame; another factor lies in
reduced access to the traditional recruitment pool. The second
condition is something we have little control over, but must be kept
in mind as we vie for recruits. The recent
organizational changes, however, are something we do have control of.
Specifically, the research group found that the changes have
resulted in poor job responsibility definitions,
an inconsistent workload varying from overload to boredom, an abuse
of power by line supervisors in assigning workloads, and most
crucially, that changes in policing
policies are vastly different then what new recruits are expecting.
It is not
surprising that the recent changes have led to negative consequences;
Crank and Langworthy point out that “organizationally-based reform
efforts, however, seldom have achieved the desired goals”(1992,
pp.339-340). Furthermore, Braga & Weisburd contend that
community policing
has not been found
to be effective in preventing crime( 2006, p. 13) These new programs
of policing add to the traditional influences of stress on the police
officer. Shane identifies two areas that
contribute to officer stress, “job content” (or the operational
environment), and “job context” (or the organizational
environment), and that “job context” is part of the daily hassle.
(2013, p. 1) Braga and Weisburd suggest that a plethora of police
reform has added to the workload of the line officer; community
oriented policing, problem oriented policing, “quality of life”
policing (2006, p 5) Part of the “job text” strain comes from
additional demand upon the officer; “To
effectively implement a community policing or problem-oriented
approach, police officers require more technical skills, and greater
language and cultural awareness. In addition to new tasks for the
organization, new skills
may be required of
individual police officers” (Raymond, 2005, p.6) Shane notes that
even management changes intended to improve communications between
line and management can cause issues. (2013 p. 2)
This office intends
to mitigate some of these negative consequences through a tripartite
strategy aimed at socialization of
officers, an effective distribution of power within the department,
and approaches to resolving organizational
conflicts. There will necessarily be some fluidity within this
discussion, as social norms are affected by formal and informal
power structures, social norms influence organizational conflict,
conflict management results in the reorganization
of both formal and informal power distribution. Each iteration of
change within these arrangements can
either add stress to an officer's workday, or lessen that load.
However, this is necessary, as the
“process of personnel
selection, training,
monitoring, and support is key to a successful police department.
Every
police manager and
supervisor shares in the responsibility for recruiting, developing,
and
retaining
high-quality individuals” (Raymond, 2005, p.1)
Police
socialization
Police
Culture Background
Paoline
notes that the traditional
description of police culture are based upon the cultural norms of
police that manage the personal strains involved
with being a policeman.(2004, p. 207) Herbert defines some of the
normative orders that shape this culture;the law, bureaucratic
control, adventure/machismo, safety, competence, and morality (1998).
As we shall see, several of these orders have relation to the
concepts of reform we will be suggesting.
New recruits are
attracted to police work in the anticipatory stage of socialization.
The views that potential recruits hold of how the department operates
plays a role in whether that potential recruit decides to join our
department. Crank and Langworthy discuss how a police department can
lose legitimacy in the eyes of the public;
this concept can be extrapolated to the perceptions that potential
recruits have as well. (1992, p.358) The Police Academy, and the
rookie tour are the sources of formal socialization for new
policemen, although the rookie tour will expose the new policeman to
the real working conditions of police life beginning the informal
socialization process. Informal socialization will continue through
the policeman's career.
Strategies
to Aid Recruitment
Strategies for
adjusting the socialization process are mainly dependent of the
results of other reforms; either reform makes our department an
attractive prospect for recruits, or it does not. Ongoing training
also plays a role in the socialization process.
Crank and
Langworthy, in their discussion of legitimacy, contribute the idea of
ceremonial ritual to re-establish legitimacy. (1992, p.358) For our
purposes, we can institute a public relations campaign describing the
success of our reforms in reducing the strain previous reforms have
added to the policeman' life.
We also suggest
that an ongoing training program to reinforce the positive norms of
police culture be established; this training program will also
maintain awareness of the department's
overall strategies. Training should be conducted by officers that
have been selected on their capability of having a direct influence
on officers. Raymond suggests a parallel between military training
programs and police training programs in there intense
initial entry and ongoing career training.(2005, xi) This ongoing
training contributes to the collective socialization process.
Anticipated
Issues
We can foresee
opposition to these changes from the influences that introduced the
original changes in the first place; “it is a common lament among
those seeking to improve policing that the policing 'craft'” or the
culmination of knowledge based on hands-on experience, is a feature
of police culture that poses a formidable obstacle to implementing
new policies and practices” (Willis, 2013, p.2) However, Willis
does go on to discussing ways in which policing theory can be
combined with policing experience for a better overall policing
strategy. We hope to aspire to this in our proposed reforms.
Distribution
of Power
Types
of Power Arrangements
French and Raven
attempt to define power from it's various sources of origination;
legitimate power, referent power, expert
power, reward power, and coercive power ( 2001, pp. 309-326) These
bases of power are reflected in various ways throughout police
command structures and through working relationships. Although
researchers tend to criticize the paramilitary command structure,
more focus should be placed on the tall power structure of
bureaucracy. The bureaucratic structure is
based on legitimate power, and theoretically provides cohesion and
coherence. (Herbert, 1998)
One negative
consequence is that command structures have also “become
increasingly bureaucratized, especially since the 'reform era' when
police leaders struggled to combat extensive corruption problems.”
(Chappell & Lanza-Kaduce, 2010, p. 2) This leads to the types of
intraorganizational conflict we shall
discuss in that section.
Other types of
power can be expressed either within the chain of command without
being bureaucratized; Morreale contends that “Knowledge, trust
and power are three essential forces of high-performance leadership”
(n.d., p.5) Expert and referent power are reflected here. Chief
Vollmer is a prime example of this in that he used his leadership
qualities to reform police practice nationally.
(Crank & Langworthy, 1992, pp.353)
Officer
Concerns
Officers have
expressed a range of concerns related to
efficiency, personal safety, and their
relation to power. Efficiency plays a large part
of job satisfaction, and thus acts a mitigating factor in job strain.
“job dissatisfaction is a result of strict policies,
overemphasis on rules, inadequate working conditions, and poor
interpersonal relationships” (Zhao, Thurman, & He,
1999) . Increased workload from implementation
of new policy adds to this ; “Problem-oriented policing is a
concept that calls on a patrol officer to address many calls for
service in a substantive manner rather than through the superficial
approach, which is common in many police systems. “(Cooper, 1997,
p. 89) Considering the lack of understanding new roles and the
possible lack some skills, the immediate peer support of using
two-unit patrols becomes apparent. Indeed, del Carmen and Guevera
found that officers perceived two-unit
patrols both more effective and safer then
one-unit patrols. (2003, p.146)
Implementation
Strategy
There
is an overlap between the strategies that deal with distribution of
power and those that reduce organizational conflict. However, one
organizational change we recommend at this point would be the
implementation of two-unit patrols; we find that having two officers
on scene increases the likelihood of having required skills,
increases efficiency,
increases officer safety, and thus increases the levels of referent
power, expert power, and coercive power for the line officer.
Reduction
of Organizational Conflict
Current Issues
We touched on the
issue of bureaucracy and undue burdens on
workload in the “Distribution of Power” section, but return to
the subject with specific examples of organizational conflict.
Herbert gives us an example of an LAPD officer who was engaged in a
pursuit of a felony suspect, but was ordered to cease the chase by
his watch commander. The officer continued the chase and captured
the suspect. The officer was interested in enforcing the law;
although his action violated the bureaucratic chain of command
during the pursuit. (1998). In the case of our own department, the
actions of line supervisors created vertical conflict with unfair and
excessive work assignments. However, line officers are not the only
ones who experience intraorganizational conflict; line supervisors
also find issues with command structures;
“This was evident in the frustrations that the supervisors
discussed about peers who did not confront poor behavior in officers,
tried to be friends and not supervisors to line officers”(Serier,
2011, p. 84)
Organizational
conflict is often the result of a lack of unity in attaining
realistic goals; the structure of organizations is often dependent
on those goals. We feel that the direction
of our policing strategy can benefit from the examination of our
overall policy goal. Braga and Weisburd
point us in the right direction with the concept of “hot spot”
policing; 10% of victims represent 40% of victimizations, 10% of
offenders cause over 50% of crime, and 10% of locations are the site
of 60% of crime. (2006). In addition, Crank and Langworthy cite
increasing body of study suggesting preventive patrol is not
effective in preventing crimes. (1992, pp. 344-345). Finally,
Guffey, Larson, & Kelso found a negative correlation between
police officer staffing and the crime rates. (2010)
Braga and Weisburd
quote Bratton (the NYPD reformer that turned that city's crime rate
around) on effective chain of command:
We
created a system in which the police commissioner, with his executive
core, first e powers and then interrogates
the precinct commander, forcing him or her to come up with a plan to
attack crime. But it should not stop there. At the next level done,
it should be the precinct commander, taking the same role as the
commissioner, empowering and interrogating the platoon commander.
Then , at the third level, the platoon commander should be asking his
sergeants... all the way down until every one in the entire
organization is empowered and motivated, active and assessed and
successful. It work s in all organizations, whether it’s 38,000
cops or Mayberry, R.F.D (Braga & Weisburd, 2006, p. 6)
Mitigation
Strategies
Our first strategy
for combating organizational conflict also has the benefit of a more
effective power distribution as discussed
in the previous section. Our solution is to move to a flatter
command structure with two-unit patrol teams on the bottom, and the
minimum amount of supervisors required to ensure effective
supervision, to support the line teams, and
to ensure that each level of police is treated fairly. This strategy
also minimizes vertical conflict within the department.
Our second strategy
is to pursue a “pulling levers” strategy focusing on the “hot
spots” of crime. Braga and Weisburd describe the “pulling
levers” strategy as identifying key
offending patterns, then collaborating resources from other agencies
and targeting the offenders with a varied set of tools. (2006, p. 6)
By utilizing other agencies to achieve common goal,
interorganizational conflict patterns can be minimized.
Conclusions
People
join the police to fight crime, redirecting their efforts they
perceive
as to social work and hampering even those efforts makes the job of a
policeman less attractive to potential officers.
Criminal
justice researchers have decried the “paramilitary” structure of
police management without considering that it is the bureaucratic
aspects of command that have hindered police work by creating
additional strain.
By
combining a more effective, safer system with officers unhindered by
organizational conflict, and by socializing the factors which create
motivated officers within this system,
we can make Centerville Police Department an organization that
officers will want to work for.
Recommendations
- A public relations campaign to explain how a new program of organization and departmental strategy will be more effective and relieve organizationally based job stress on officers. This PR campaign is dependent on the success of other reforms.
- An ongoing training program to reinforce the positive norms of police culture that aid in reducing job stress; this training program will also maintain awareness of the department's overall strategies.
- Implementation of two-unit patrols; having immediate peer support increases officer efficiency and safety; it also increases the power held by the line officer
- Move to a flatter command structure with less management and greater responsibility on the line; however, a clearly defined chain of command is maintained.
- Focus the overall crime fighting mission of the department to a “pulling levers” strategy targeting the “hot spots” of crime; this clarifies the goals and duties of the line officer, shares goals and responsibilities with other interested agencies, and reduces the potential for organizational conflict within our own department as well as with other agencies.
References
Braga, A. A., & Weisburd, D. L.
(2006). Police Innovation and Crime Prevention: Lessons Learned from
Police Research over the Past 20 Years. Retrieved from
http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/218585.pdf?q=ideas-in-american-policing
Chappell, A. T., & Lanza-Kaduce, L.
(2010). Police academy socialization: Understanding the lessons
learned in a paramilitary-bureaucratic organization. Journal of
Contemporary Ethnography, 39(2), 187–214.
doi:10.1177/0891241609342230
Cooper, C. (1997). Patrol police
officer conflict resolution processes. Journal of Criminal
Justice, 25(2), 87–101. Retrieved August 22, 2014 from
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235296000530
Crank, J. P., & Langworthy, R.
(1992, Summer). An institutional perspective of policing. Journal
of Criminal Law and Criminology, 338–363. Retrieved August 10,
2014 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1143860
Del Carmen, A., & Guevera, L.
(2003). Police officers on two-officer units: A study of attitudinal
responses towards a patrol experiment. Policing: An International
Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 26(1).
doi:10.1108/13639510310460332
French, J. R., & Raven, B. (2001).
The bases of social power. Modern Classics of Leadership, 2,
309–326. Retrieved August 24, 2014 from
http://pdf-release.net/external/2807185/pdf-release-dot-net-the_bases_of_social_power_-_chapter_20.pdf
Guffey, J. E., Larson, J. G., &
Kelso, C. (2010). Police officer staffing: Analyzing the Commonly
Held Belief that More Cops Equals Less Crime1. Professional Issues
in Criminal Justice, 52(2). Retrieved August 10, 2014
from
http://kucampus.kaplan.edu/documentstore/Docs10/pdf/CJ/PICJ/PICJ_V5N2_3_Guffey_29_43.pdf
Herbert, S. (1998). Police subculture
reconsidered. Criminology, 36(2). Retrieved August 21,
2014 from
http://clontz.mc-companies.com/additional_readings/subculture.htm
Morreale, S. (n.d.). Law
enforcement leadership:Literature and practice. New England
Community-Police Partnership.
Retrieved Retrieved August 15, 2014 from
http://www.fstopltd.com/Police_Leadership.pdf
Paoline, E. A. (2004). Shedding light
on police culture: An examination of officers’ occupational
attitudes. Police Quarterly, 7(2), 205–236.
doi:10.1177/1098611103257074
Raymond, B. (2005). Police
personnel challenges after September 11: Anticipating expanded duties
and a changing labor pool. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
Retrieved August 10, 2014 from
Open WorldCat, ISBN 0833038508 9780833038500
Serier, J. (2011). Cop confidential:
Police supervision and sub-culture (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved
August 10, 2014 from http://ir.stthomas.edu/caps_ed_lead_docdiss/20/
Shane, J. M.
(2013). Daily work experiences and police performance. Police
Practice and Research, 14(1), 17–34.
doi:10.1080/15614263.2011.596717
Willis, J. J.
(2013). Improving police: What’s craft got to do with it?
Ideas in American Policing, 16. Retrieved August 10,
2014 from
https://www.policefoundation.org/sites/g/files/g798246/f/201306/IAP16_Willis_2.pdf
Zhao, J., Thurman,
Q., & He, N. (1999). Sources of job satisfaction among police
officers: A test of demographic and work environment models. Justice
Quarterly, 16(1), 153–173. doi:10.1080/07418829900094091
No comments:
Post a Comment