GED Program Selection
Review
Due
to decreasing budget allocations or educational purposes, the DOC has
decided to choose one of two programs to assist inmates with securing
a GED. The first program is Education First; Education First has a
cost of $500 per inmate, and a success rate of 50%. The second
program is GED Prep, which has a cost of $5,000 per inmate and a
success rate of 80%. GED Prep is 60% more effective as a program
than Education First, but at costs of 1000% the rate of GED Prep.
Now we must look at the costs of failure; 80% of inmates without a
high school degree that are released return to prison, while 40% of
inmates with a high school degree that are released return to prison.
The cost of keeping an inmate in prison is at $32,000 per year.*
Let us
compare the two programs per groups of 10 prisoners:
Education
First
10
inmates at $500 each = $5,000
5
inmates pass, of whom 2 return to prison
2
recidivists
at $32000 = $64,000
5
inmates fail, of whom 4 return to prison
4
recidivists
at $32000 = $128,000
Total
Cost of Education First for 1 year = $197,000
Cost
of Education First per additional recidivist
year of prison time = $192,000
GED
Prep
10
inmates at $5000 each = $50,000
8
inmates pass, of whom 3.2 return to prison
3.2
recidivists
at $32000 = $102,400
2
inmates fail, of whom 1.6 return to prison
1.6
recidivists
at $32000 = $51,200
Total
Cost of GED Prep = $203, 600
Cost
of GED Prep per additional recidivist
year of prison time = $153,600
In
comparing the cost per year of these programs, there are two
comparisons to make; the first of which is the initial cost, and the
second is the cost per additional year of recidivist
incarceration. There is a difference of $6,600 per 10 inmates per
recidivist
year in prison, or $660 per inmate for the initial year of prison
time, with the Education First program being the cheaper. However,
for every additional year of recidivist
incarceration, GED Prep saves DOC $38,400 per 10 inmates, or $3,840
per inmate. To finalize the comparison, the average length of
incarceration for recidivist
offenders would be needed. However, figures provided by BJS
would be inaccurate to use because “Inmates
whose sentence was less than 1 year were also excluded” (Durose,
Cooper, & Snyder, 2014, p ,17). The lack of accurate tracking is
compounded by the fact that this is the population that would prove
it cost effective to use the services of Education
First.
The
interim recommendation is to use the services of Education First
until an accurate count of recidivist
sentences can be compiled which compares the number of sentences with
a duration under a year against an aggregate of sentencing in which
the years after the first year were counted.
References
Durose,
M. R., Cooper, A. D., & Snyder, H. N. (2014). Recidivism of
Prisoners Released in 30 States in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010.
Bureau
of Justice Statistics.
Retrieved November 21, 2014 from
https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/media/publications/BJS%20recidivism%20study,%202014.pdf
*All
figures provided by DOC
No comments:
Post a Comment