There
are three critical issues in contemporary law enforcement. The first
is the war on police. The second is the failure of police to address
politicians violating their oaths to serve the public, and the third
is the use of evidence based policing to
make changes to police operations. The war on police can be
recognized by dishonest and deceptive media coverage of police
actions; examples can be seen in the Ferguson and McKinney cases in
which key facts were left out of the coverage.
However, this is a propaganda war generaled from the highest levels
of the Democratic Party, as “Obama
has created a pathway for the cop hating rhetoric to flourish”
(Clarke, 2015)..Another example can be seen in the prosecution
of six policemen in Baltimore related to a death in custody; not only
were the investigators surprised by the severity of the charges, but
the prosecutor has gone to great lengths to prevent the facts of the
case from being made public by using a gag order (“Baltimore
prosecutor seeks”, 2015, para. 1). This leads into the failure of
law enforcement agencies and line officers
to bring politicians to account for their crimes. In Ferguson and
Baltimore, politicians made the choice to ignore their sworn duty to
protect the community and instead, “gave
space to destroy”, to violent rioters. Another example would be in
the Fast and Furious gunrunning case, in which the Obama
administration provided weapons to violent narco-terror cartels, in
violation of treaty with Mexico and in violation of the duty to
protect. Third, evidence based policing is the trend that has
continued from Vollmer through today, in which using the scientific
method improves both the professionalism and efficiency of the
police. Carter contends that “ we learned that experimental
research could be effectively performed in a police agency without
posing undue threats to public safety” (1995, p. 3)
Not
all of these challenges generate controversy.
Although there is controversy regarding the war on police within the
law enforcement community, but discussion
in the public is limited due to lack of media focus... from the same
media driving the war on police. Even so, "rank-and-file
brethren in police departments nationwide, says police feel under
siege and demoralized by the bias against them" (Bello, 2014,
para. 4) Regarding the second issue, there
is very limited discussion which is restricted to right wing
viewpoints, and there is ambiguity as far as local laws (nonfeasance,
misfeasance, malfeasance) and Constitutional
responsibilities for dealing with such ssues.
There is some academic dispute about which evidence
policies have worked and which haven't. These disputes carry over
into the political sphere. Three strikes sentencing and broken
windows policing are two examples in which studies can be at odds
with each other regarding results. Foe example, Bowling asserts that
New York's drop in crime was more a result of a decline in the use of
crack cocaine (1999).
Evidence
based policing has created the most change of the three issues. The
war on police has not driven a formal change in police departments,
but line officers are showing a trend
towards not wanting to do their duty if doing so will place their
careers and potentially their lives at risk , as the police are
afraid of getting arrested for performing their duty” (CNN, 2015)
The second has not driven any change. Although the concepts are
based upon basic adherence to the law of the land, and duty of public
office holders and sworn law enforcement
officers , the consideration of this issue is considered to be
extremist. Evidence based policing has driven many changes, although
the debate and politics muddle he water regarding the efficiency of
the changes. Levitt (2004) discusses
several possible reasons, not including “Broken windows”
policing, that may have been factors in New York's declining crime
rate.
The
changes driven by these issues cab be either temporary or permanent.
In the first, these are recent changes and may be temporary
depending on how the war on cops is dealt with.
There are no changes on the second. In
the third, both. Some changes like the shift to community policing
have been more permanent, while we can see
that the broken windows approached has been discarded due to
politics; New York's Mayor DiBlasio ended broken windows policing for
political reasons, and we have already seen the rise in crime in New
York (Celona, 2015).
These
changes reflect a shift in our society as a
whole. The country has shifted leftward with control of the media
(Groseclose & Milyo, 2005), education (Yancey, 2012), and the
bureaucracy into the hands of liberals. This shift has left the
country less educated, less patriotic, and more susceptible to
propaganda and malfeasance by politicians and bureaucrats.
References
Baltimore
prosecutor seeks gag order in Freddie Gray case. (2015, May 15).
Fox News. Retrieved June 20, 2015 from
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/05/15/baltimore-prosecutor-seeks-gag-order-in-freddie-gray-case/
Bello,
M. (n.d.). “It can be fearful”: Police feeling under siege. USA
Today. Retrieved June 7, 2015, from
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/12/22/police-reactshootings/20773395/
Bowling,
B. (1999, Autumn). The rise and fall of New York murder: Zero
Tolerance or crack’s decline?
British Journal of Criminology:
VOL. 39 NO. 4. Retrieved April 15, 2014 from
www.umass.edu/legal/Benavides/Fall2004/397G/.../7%20Bowling.pdf
Carter,
D. L. (1995). Reflections on
the move to community policing:
Regional Community Policing Institute. Retrieved August 10, 2014 from
http://webs.wichita.edu/depttools/depttoolsmemberfiles/rcpi/Policy%20Papers/Reflections%20on%20Comm%20Pol.pdf
Celona,
L. (2015, May 26). You’re 45% more likely to be murdered in de
Blasio’s Manhattan. The
New York Post.
Retrieved May 27, 2015 from
http://nypost.com/2015/05/26/youre-45-more-likely-to-be-murdered-in-de-blasios-manhattan/
Clarke,
D. [SheriffClarke].(2015, May 11). I will say it again. Obama has
created a pathway for the cop hating rhetoric to flourish. He has
led the chorus.[Tweet]. Retrieved May 15, 2015 from
https://twitter.com/SheriffClarke/status/597834103556349952
CNN.
(2015, May 28). Baltimore union: 'Police are under siege'. Retrieved
June 7, 2015 from
http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2015/05/29/exp-baltimore-police-freddie-gray-crime-marquez-dnt-erin.cnn
Groseclose,
T., & Milyo, J. (2005). A Measure of Media Bias. Quarterly
Journal of Economics,
120(4),
1191–1237. http://doi.org/10.1162/003355305775097542
Levitt,
S. (2004). Understanding why crime fell in the1990s: Four factors
that explain the decline
and six that do not. Journal
of Economic Perspectives, (18)1.
Yancey,
G. (2012). Recalibrating Academic Bias. Academic Questions, 25(2),
267–278.
http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/10.1007/s12129-012-9282-y
No comments:
Post a Comment