Does
Quality of Life enforcement (and perception of crime reduction)
increase or decrease the level of cooperation with the local police
officers enforcing penalties for minor offenses? Additionally,
does quality of life enforcement lead to racial profiling or
heavy-handed enforcement policies in immigrant and (or) lower
socio-economic communities? How?
Quality-of-life
(Broken Windows) policing is not “Zero Tolerance” policing,
according to William Bratton, who assets that “Zero Tolerance” is
a term used by critics of the policy (2015, p.3). Bratton instead
emphasized that discretion was key to reducing fear in neighborhoods
(2015, pp. 3-4). This becomes notable due to the “ dangerous and
increasing normalization of ignorance and violence” that can
silence the law-abiding majority” (Police Executive Research
Forum, 2004, p.76). Cooperation between police and local communities
can be seen in that many quality-of-life arrests are derived by
service calls reported by citizens (Bratton, 2015. p. 4).
Underscoring this is the participation by minorities in placing
service calls to NYPD, as “there are intractable racial disparities
in who...more importantly, who suffers from—crime and
disorder...72.3 percent of victims are black or Hispanic (Bratton,
2015, p.6).
However,
such statistics do not automatically lead to a happy relation between
police and minority communities. Nagy and Podolny point to the
cases of Abner Louima and Amadou Diallo as incidents in which
aggressive quality-of-life policing led to police brutality or the
death of a suspect (2008, p.16). These incidents led to a wave of
criticism of NYPD. In addition, the “stop and frisk” method
associated with quality-of-life policing also led to charges of
racial profiling. In Floyd v. City of New York (2013),
the court found that reasonable-suspicion-based stops were based on
on “the right people, the right time, the right location”, and
thus racially based (p.82). It is interesting to note that the
court found that while 80% of such stops were targeted against
minorities out of a 60% population rate, it did not balance the
percentage of stops against the numbers of either arrests (80%) or
victims (72%).
Even
so, Bratton asserts that “Police and community have more in common
that unites us than divides us” He uses the example of Eric
Garner, who died as a result of a quality-of-life contact to
demonstrate this concept. Bratton compared the polling in the black
community's attitude towards the specific incident, in which 90 % of
respondents felt the police “had no excuse” for the incident with
the black community's attitude towards quality-of-life policing, in
which 56% of respondents supported the program (2015, p.7). This
reflects the research of Weisburd et al on community views of the
strategy as a whole, “We do not find, on the one hand, that the
level of aggressive order maintenance policing delivered in our study
increased citizen fear or reduced perceptions of police legitimacy”
(2010, p. 146). It may appear then, that community perception of
police is based more on individual incidents than on policy results
or implications.
Bratton,
W. (2015). Broken windows and quality-of-life policing in New
York City. New York Police Department Retrieved May 28, 2015
from
http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/downloads/pdf/analysis_and_planning/qol.pdf
Nagy,
A. R., & Podolny, J. (2008). William Bratton and the NYPD
crime control through middle management reform (Yale case
07-015). Yale School of Management. Retrieved August 10, 2014 from
https://icf.som.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Case_Bratton_2nd_ed_Final_and_Complete.pdf
Floyd
v. City of New York, 08 Civ. 1034 (2013)
Police
Executive Research Forum (PERF). (2004). Community
policing: The past, present and future. Retrieved May 25, 2015
from
http://www.policeforum.org/assets/docs/Free_Online_Documents/Community_Policing/community%20policing%20-%20the%20past%20present%20and%20future%202004.pdf
Weisburd,
D., Hinkle, J. C., Famega, C., & Ready, J. (2010). Legitimacy,
Fear and Collective Efficacy in Crime Hot Spots: Assessing the
Impacts of Broken Windows Policing Strategies on Citizen Attitudes
(Grant No. 2007-IJ-CX-0047). Department of Justice. Retrieved October
3, 2014 from
http://www.iadlest.org/Portals/0/Files/Documents/DDACTS/Docs/Legitimacy
%20Fear%20and%20collective%20efficacy%20in%20Crime%20Hot%20Spots.pdf
Does
CompStat lead to false reporting in all departments that is employed
in? Has it led to all sub-units within a department reporting
false data? There isn't data to support that
dissertation.
Yes, pressure can cause falsification, but it does not lead to it automatically
The silver lining here is that in those cases where a police manager falsified data, the system was able to identify someone who placed career over duty to the public
Yes, pressure can cause falsification, but it does not lead to it automatically
The silver lining here is that in those cases where a police manager falsified data, the system was able to identify someone who placed career over duty to the public
No comments:
Post a Comment